Commensal communication to the brain: pathways and behavioral consequences

John Bienenstock
Commensal communication to the brain: pathways and behavioral consequences


Commensal communication to the brain: pathways and behavioral consequences

John Bienenstock, CM, MD(Hon), FRCP, FRCP(C), FRS(C)1,2*

1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 2Department of Medicine, The McMaster Brain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Keywords: probiotics; enteric nervous system; behaviour; autism; brain

Published: 24 August 2012

Microbial Ecology in Health & Disease 2012. © 2012 John Bienenstock. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citation: Microbial Ecology in Health & Disease 2012, 23: 19007 -


In recent years there has been an explosion of investigation of the microbiota which constitutes the gut microbiome (15). The trillions of bacteria which together make this up are engaged in multiple interactions with each other and the host in which they live. Indeed, they have been regarded as an additional organ within the external compartment of the body which influences the endocrine, metabolic and immune functions of the host. It has only recently received attention from the point of view of influence on the nervous system and this aspect has received the title ‘microbiome-gut-brain axis’ (6). This brief paper highlights some of the recent findings which promote the functional importance of this communication between gut commensals and the enteric and central nervous systems and was part of a lecture given recently at a meeting at the Karolinska Institutet, focused on ‘The Gut and The Brain’, with focus on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

It is well appreciated in clinical medicine that patients with hepatic encephalopathy are best treated with non-absorbable wide spectrum antibiotics and laxatives thus confirming the relationship between overgrowth of certain normal conventional bacterial gut contents and brain dysfunction (7). The gut–brain-axis refers to a bi-directional communication pathway which is contributed to by the gut microbiome.

It is also recognized that the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is associated with psychiatric dysfunction and it is argued by some that this is a common co-morbidity and that the key factors linking these together are what is called dysbiosis, which refers to an imbalance of the normal gut commensal population (8). IBS has also been connected with increased psychosocial stress especially since this has particular effects on the composition of normal gut microbiota. In this regard it is important to note the landmark observations by Sudo et al. (9) who showed that germ-free (GF) mice had exaggerated hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis responses to acute stress and that these were normalized by conventionalization with normal feces. Additionally, they could be restored to normal adult levels by monoassociation with a probiotic bacteria, Bifidobacterium infantis, but only if these treatments occurred in early life. Thus the HPA axis in these animals was programmable and programmed since attempts to treat mice in adulthood failed to reset the HPA response in terms of the corticosterone pathway.

On the other hand, Gareau et al. (10) showed that ingestion of two Lactobacilli was able to attenuate HPA responses if given in adulthood and this apparent discrepant observation is not yet resolved.

Heijtz et al. (11) showed that the brains of GF mice differed neurochemically and functionally from conventionally housed animals and that again early conventionalization of the gut microbiome restored these differences to those seen in adult life, suggesting the importance of the composition of the gut microbiome to normal brain development. We have also studied GF animals and have shown that they intrinsically express anxiolytic behavior and have alterations in the neurotransmitter receptors for NMDA and 5-HT in specific brain areas and also have reduced brain-derived neurotophic factor (BDNF) expression in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus which is compatible with their behavioral phenotype (12). Indeed, different strains of mice have different behavioral phenotypes and Bercik et al. (13) have shown remarkably that this seems to depend on the normal microbiome of each mouse strain since fecal transplantation of one strain's microbiome to another either in antibiotic treated or GF states, conferred the donor's behavior to the recipient.

From the observations listed above, questions clearly arise as to how non-pathogenic bacteria in the intestine communicate with the brain. This aspect of communication is still in its early days yet we are beginning to obtain clues as to possible mechanisms. The ingestion of a probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus (JB-1) was shown to inhibit visceral pain responses in rats subjected to colo-rectal distension and this was accompanied by a decrease in electrical responses in the afferent fibers of the dorsal root ganglia (14). Similar inhibition of pain was seen in mice treated with non-absorbable antibiotics (15) or another strain of Lactobacillus and opioid and cannabinoid receptors were upregulated in gut epithelia exposed to yet another Lactobacillus in association with anti-nociception (16). These studies emphasize the fact that single commensal bacteria given to normal animals can change their visceral pain perception.

Several further pieces of evidence support these observations. Exposure of the intestinal lumen to L. rhamnosus (JB-1) in both rats and mice, has shown that a specific enteric nerve subtype, AH but not S cells are affected by this treatment in a uniform manner within minutes of application of bacteria into the intestinal lumen (17). The conclusions were that the bacterium directly or indirectly inhibits the calcium activated potassium channel in these cells and closely mimics the specific channel blocker, TRAM 34. Similar results obtain from experiments looking at patch clamped myenteric plexus AH neurons from animals which had ingested the same bacterium for several days (18). In none of these experiments did another Lactobacillus (L. salivarius) have these effects suggesting that the functional effects of such bacteria are highly strain specific.

We have examined the effects of 28 days oral treatment of mice with L. rhamnosus (JB-1) on behavior and shown it to have an anxiolytic effect at the same time altering the expression of GABA A and B receptors in specific parts of the brain in a manner compatible with a benzodiazepine-like effect (19). At the same time we found that this probiotic treatment also attenuated the HPA axis response to acute stress despite administration in adulthood. However, when the animals were subjected to sub-diaphragmatic vagotomy prior to ingestion of the probiotic organism, both behavioral and central neurochemical changes were abrogated.

From the data highlighted herein, it is reasonable to conclude that the balance of normal bacteria in the intestine can have far reaching effects on both brain development and function, even in adults. The mechanisms and pathways which are utilized may be different in the case of different organisms and different genetic backgrounds since vagotomy does not always prevent behavioral changes. The extent to which these experimental results can be extrapolated to the human and found to be relevant in the clinical setting remains to be settled but the experimental evidence presented certainly emphasizes the potential importance of further detailed exploration of the principles beginning to be established in animals.

Conflict of interest and funding

The author has received research support in the form of unrestricted grants from Abbott Nutrition and BioGaia funding to conduct this study.


  1. Mayer EA. Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut–brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011; 12: 453–66. [Crossref]
  2. Collins SM, Denou E, Verdu EF, Bercik P. The putative role of the intestinal microbiota in the irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41: 850–3. [Crossref]
  3. Cryan JF, O'Mahony SM. The microbiome-gut–brain axis: from bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 187–92. [Crossref]
  4. Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 6: 306–14. [Crossref]
  5. Forsythe P, Sudo N, Dinan T, Taylor VH, Bienenstock J. Mood and gut feelings. Brain Behav Immun 2010; 24: 9–16. [Crossref]
  6. Bravo JA, Julio-Pieper M, Forsythe P, Kunze W, Dinan T, Bienenstock J, et al. Communication between gastrointestinal bacteria and the nervous system. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2012 (in press).
  7. Bass NM. Review article: the current pharmacological therapies for hepatic encephalopathy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25(Suppl 1): S23–31. [Crossref]
  8. O'Mahony SM, Marchesi JR, Scully P, Codling C, Ceolho AM, Quigley EM, et al. Early life stress alters behavior, immunity, and microbiota in rats: implications for irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illnesses. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 65: 263–7. [Crossref]
  9. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol 2004; 558: 263–75. [Crossref]
  10. Gareau MG, Jury J, MacQueen G, Sherman PM, Perdue MH. Probiotic treatment of rat pups normalises corticosterone release and ameliorates colonic dysfunction induced by maternal separation. Gut 2007; 56: 1522–8. [Crossref]
  11. Heijtz RD, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjorkholm B, Samuelsson A, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 3047–52. [Crossref]
  12. Neufeld KM, Kang N, Bienenstock J, Foster JA. Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 255–64, e119. [Crossref]
  13. Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J, et al. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 599–609, e1–3. [Crossref]
  14. Kamiya T, Wang L, Forsythe P, Goettsche G, Mao Y, Wang Y, et al. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus reuteri on visceral pain induced by colorectal distension in Sprague–Dawley rats. Gut 2006; 55: 191–6. [Crossref]
  15. Verdu EF, Bercik P, Verma-Gandhu M, Huang XX, Blennerhassett P, Jackson W, et al. Specific probiotic therapy attenuates antibiotic induced visceral hypersensitivity in mice. Gut 2006; 55: 182–90. [Crossref]
  16. Rousseaux C, Thuru X, Gelot A, Barnich N, Neut C, Dubuquoy L, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med 2007; 13: 35–7. [Crossref]
  17. Wang B, Mao YK, Diorio C, Pasyk M, Wu RY, Bienenstock J, et al. Luminal administration ex vivo of a live Lactobacillus species moderates mouse jejunal motility within minutes. FASEB J 2010; 24: 4078–88. [Crossref]
  18. Kunze WA, Mao YK, Wang B, Huizinga JD, Ma X, Forsythe P, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri enhances excitability of colonic AH neurons by inhibiting calcium-dependent potassium channel opening. J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13: 2261–70. [Crossref]
  19. Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 16050–5. [Crossref]

*John Bienenstock
Department of Pathology
The McMaster Brain-Body Institute
St. Joseph's Healthcare
Hamilton L8N 4A6, ON
Tel: +905-522-1155, ext. 35203

About The Author

John Bienenstock


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Related Content